The History of Christianity and The Catholic Church... Part 4

By 1213 AD, the Barons of England had already acquired distaste with being treated like the King's slaves, so they developed and implemented what became known as the Magna Carta. The Barons took to the sword and forced King John to sign the decree. Pope Innocent III, maintaining his position in the original contract of 1213, declared the Magna Charta to be "unlawful and unjust as it is base and shameful. . . whereby the Apostolic See is brought into contempt, the Royal Prerogative diminished, the English outraged, and the whole enterprise of the Crusade greatly imperiled."

During this time, inquisitions stemming from the first inquisition of 1208 implemented to completely destroy the Cathars, were launched by secular rulers to prosecute "heretics". Often done with the approval of the Catholic church hierarchy, the inquisitions were mostly done to counter-act the threat of the pursuing Muslim invasion. Sometimes however, these inquisitions were enacted for political reasons.

Over the next couple of centuries, papal authority shuffled locations. Residing under French rule in 1309 AD (it was during this time that the remaining Knights Templar left the European mainland and set up shop in Scotland as the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. The Pope at the time Clement V, had been in exile in France and restricted under the authority of King Phillip IV, which is why he was powerless to stop their demise.) The papacy moved back to Rome in 1376 AD. Disputing claims over the papacy in Rome continued, until 1417 when Martin V was named Pope.

During the early 15th century in an effort to combat the ensuing Islamic conquest, Pope Nicholas V granted Portugal the right to capture and enslave the Muslims. This also granted authority for Portugal to capture and enslave any non-Christian believers. Non-Christian believers being anyone not defined a Christian by the established government. (This is similar to our current situation. Our government can define you and me as an "enemy combatant" thereby establishing you or me as a "domestic terrorist". This is a political means of covertly eliminating any and all opposition to the establishment's agenda. The Roman empire perfected this type of manipulation and we can thank the Catholic church for its preservation of this deadly and effective technique.)

In 1453 AD, Constantinople, former capitol to the Roman Empire, fell to the Muslim Ottoman Invaders.

(Many western world explorations began during the 15th century, and considering the immense support and financial backing by the Catholic church, these explorations effectively spread the Catholic religion in the explored territories. This is the reason for the modern Catholic influence in Central and South America... [According to a 2000 census, 88% of Mexico's population professes to be Catholic.] the Portuguese, Spanish, and French explorations to these areas left a huge Catholic footprint. These explorations and their insistence on conversion to Catholicism, led to the horrible accounts of the "inquisition" type persecution of the Native American peoples. Torture and murder awaited the indigenous people of these regions who refused to convert to the Catholic faith.)

Also worth mentioning is the fact that the treaty of 1213 solidified the Pope's authority as "the Vicar of Christ" and his claim of everything and everyone on earth as a tradition as I had noted previously. The financial backing of the Pope was key in these explorations and converting foreign peoples to Catholicism was one of the main priorities in the explorations. This was the beginning of the papacy's quest for global domination.

In 1480 AD, one such "inquisition" was instituted by King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain. In what was known as the Spanish Inquisition, it attempted to deal with distrusted converts from Judaism and Islam to Catholicism. More than 3,000 people were murdered over the next 350 years.

In 1509 AD, the scholar Erasmus wrote "In Praise of Folly". This work depicted the public outcry and detest of the corruption within the Catholic church. Several organized councils were held during this period and attempted to address the corruption and tried to reform the abuses within the church. They were unsuccessful.

In 1517 AD, Martin Luther (Lutherans) sent his Ninety-Five thesis in a letter to several bishops and posted it on the church door of Wittenburg. Luther protested many key points of Catholic doctrine including the blasphemous sale of indulgences (the ability to financially purchase forgiveness of sin). Shortly there after other men including John Calvin (Calvinists) began to also come forward and protest the corruption of the Catholic church.

In 1521 AD, the Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan converted the first Catholics in the Philippines.

In 1522 AD, French Catholic missionaries arrived in Mexico and established the first schools and hospitals. (The Catholic church had predominantly created the European University system, which was effectively established in the communities that had built up around the urban Catholic missionaries. You might ask yourself where the structure, curriculum modeling, and overall underlying influence of our modern day university system came from...The use of educational institutions [i.e. our public education system] as political/religious propaganda and its use as a means of public conditioning, certainly can trace its roots to this Catholic rendered establishment.)

In 1534 AD, Ignatius of Loyola and six other students at the university of Paris made a pact with one another promising chastity and good works towards others. They also pledged unwavering devotion to the Pope and his will. Called The Jesuits or the Society of Jesus, they took a very aggressive approach to the cause of the up coming Counter-Reformation. The Jesuits are among the secret societies which perpetuate "new age" dogma. This group developed a series of "exercises" for converts to participate in. These "exercises" included meditation, visualisation, having a "spiritual guide", and finding "God's" will for your life through this meditation and instead of thinking of God, "feel" him. (This is nothing more than mysticism, clearing your mind of conscious thought and sensing or feeling instead. This is a very common practice in eastern religion and New Age philosophy. In the United States alone, the order of the Jesuits maintains over 50 colleges, universities and/or high schools. Remember the Catholic church is responsible for the structuring of the modern school and university system. Therefore, who do you think established our earliest universities? ALL of our major political leaders graduate from some ivy league university prior to being able to run for public office... do you think that they are not influenced by the Catholic church's curriculum? At Gregorian University the current Pope... Pope Benedict XVI said "one of the greatest services the Society of Jesus (or Jesuits) carries out for the UNIVERSAL Church." Benedict reveals where the Jesuits loyalty lies..and the Popes as well, because the Jesuits were founded on the principle of carrying out the will of the presiding pope... The UNIVERSAL church. The same unitarian garbage to be found amongst the Luciferians. And there you have it, the Catholic's connection the New Age Movement... More on the Jesuits later...)

In 1545 AD at the Council of Trent, the Catholic church attempted to address the public's grievances by establishing the Counter-Reformation.The church reaffirmed many central Catholic religious beliefs. Several other religious orders emerged as a result, including the Theatines and Barnabites.

During the mid to late 1500's, wars throughout Europe, including Germany and France, broke out between the Catholic church and the advocates of the Protestant Reformation.

In 1598 AD, the Edict of Nantes was erected. This granted civil and religious toleration to Protestants and was hesitantly accepted by Pope Clement VIII.

During the mid 1600's, Pope Innocent IX attempted to further reform abuses by the church, tried to unite Europe against the ensuing Turkish invasions, and openly condemned religious persecution of any kind. Most of his ambitions were of course to gain political favor.

In 1685 AD, King Louie XIV of France revoked the Edict of Nantes which granted religious tolerance. This along with many other conflicts during this time spurred a backlash against Christianity. The French Revolution soon convened eventually leading to the nationalization of church property and the outlawing of the Catholic church in France.


During the 16th and 17th centuries, Catholic missions expanded globally. Missionaries under the Spanish Jesuit Francis Xavier evangelized in India and Japan further spreading Catholicism. (This where the Jesuits really firmly defined their mystic practices.) Catholicism had spread significantly in Central America and made its way into North America due to the Spanish explorations.

In 1773 AD, after causing the outlaw of Christian missionaries in China, the Jesuits were dissolved by Pope Clement XIV due to pressure from European rulers.

In 1776 AD, San Francisco was founded as a Spanish colony.

In 1781 AD, The colony of Los Angeles was founded, furthering the Catholic imprint on the North American continent.

During this rush for expansion, the Native Americans benefited from the goods and services available to them through the Catholic Missions that built up from within the Spanish settlements, but as had been a problem since explorers first stepped foot in the western world... diseases brought from the East did not bode well for the Indians.

In 1801 AD, Napolean effectively re-establishes the Catholic church in France with the Concordat of 1801. Napoleon's conquests brought about a revival in the Catholic church. Enthusiasm and a renewed respect for the papacy developed as a result.

In 1814 AD, the Jesuits are restored to power through what is known as the papal bull Sollicitudo omnium ecclesiarum.

In 1870 AD the First Vatican Council convened, recognizing the Pope as the abiding moral and spiritual authority over the worldwide church and granted the pope infallibility. This defined the Pope as the universal voice of all practicing Catholics, basically creating a type of authoritarian religious fascism, over-riding any opposition to the Pope's imposed dogma. The dogmatic constitution that emerged from this council stated that the pope maintained on behalf of Christ and his kingdom the, and I quote, "full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the whole Church" As a result, this spurred much controversy and several Germanic churches split off from the church. This soon led to the creation of the so called "Old Catholic church", who rejected papal infallibility and rather believed that infallibility could only be attributed to a council of Bishops.

By the end of the 19th Century, European powers had gained control of much of Africa's interior. Following the European governments into Africa, the Catholic church missionaries built schools, hospitals, monasteries and churches... everything a society/community needs to be conditioned and controlled by the establishment.

By the dawn of the 20th century, the Catholic church had influenced every corner of the globe.

The industrial revolution and thus technology was drastically changing the world... science now had become a staple in mainstream thinking... the secret gnostic knowledge of old was no longer so secret... the information age was beginning... the church could no longer withhold and sustain control... society was becoming "modernized". In response, the Catholic church felt a need to react to these changes and respond accordingly to maintain their power... in comes Vatican II...

In 1962 AD, the Second Vatican Council convened. This council was intended to be a continuation of the First Vatican Council and further modernize the mission statement of the Catholic church and its intentions. There were four sessions over a period of four years in which over 2,900 men including ALL bishops from around the world attended, making it the largest gathering of any church council to date. Seventeen Orthodox Churches and Protestant denominations sent representatives as observers. Several dozen representatives of other Christian communities were present during the opening session, and by the end of the 4th Council Period, the number grew to almost 100.

During the first session, many of the guidelines for the remaining sessions were established, including committee appointments. At the end of the First session, pope John XXIII died and pope Paul VI was elected to succeed him.

During the second session, pope Paul VI addressed 4 main issues:

-to fully define the nature of the church and the role of the bishop;
-to renew the Catholic church;
-to restore unity amongst all Christians;
-and to start implementing a dialogue with the contemporary world.

(Establish a dialogue with the contemporary world?? Why is this necessary? Christ told us what we should say and what we were to do as his followers and his disciples. Christ delivered the truth on the basis of personal need.. never apologizing or stepping away from the truth for anyone. If the dialogue Jesus offered was not acceptable to the ones listening then, as the young rich man did, they walked away and Jesus continued unscathed in his quest to profess the eternal truth. The truth in and of itself cannot mutate or change... for if God is eternal and God is also truth...then therefore is the truth not also eternal?? The changes made within the Catholic church dating back to its very inception has had absolutely nothing to do with the truth. Changes were made simply for political power and control. Many pagan practices were incorporated into the church so that pagans, not just the Christians, would recognize the Catholic church as the ultimate authority and pay tribute. This is exactly what the Catholic church attempted to do with Vatican II... to re-arrange doctrine for the lifestyles of men. Jesus most assuredly preached that we are to change our lives in light of the truth...not the other way around. Again I quote Matthew 15:7-9... "Ye hypocrites, well did Isaiah prophesy of you, saying,8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.")

During the third section, many proposals were drafted and much was debated on leading up to what would transpire from the fourth and final session. These proposals include such hotly debated topics such as the particular methods in which to modernize the church and religious freedoms, therefore revoking the oldest doctrine within the Catholic church... the one, true, most holy, apostolic church of Christ....membership of which, being the only way to acquire salvation.

In 1965 AD, the final and 4th session of Vatican II commenced.

Pope Paul VI made several changes:

-formed a Papal Commission for the Media of Social Communication to assist bishops with the pastoral use of these media;

-declared a jubilee from January 1 to May 26, 1966 and urged all Catholics to study and accept the decisions of the council and apply them in a spiritual renewal of the church;

-changed the procedures of the Holy Office, and changed the title, giving it the name of the "Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith"

-made permanent the secretariates for the Promotion of Christian Unity, for Non-Christian Religions, and for Non-Believers.

Several things here that I would like to comment on...

-First, the pope established a commission to "assist" bishops with the use of the media?? So before the bishop can address the media, the commission not only filters, but places propaganda material in the bishop's hands... controlling what the sheep are fed... sounds like our government and the propaganda force that is the mass media. Oh wait... Rome (the Pope) owns us anyway... so that makes sense. I wonder how many people from the press were at this council.

-Second, the Holy Office is now called the "Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith". Very clearly here the doctrine is generalized from a doctrine of the Pope on behalf of Jesus to a doctrine that encompasses "faith"...well according to how it is written, that includes every person that has faith. According to Hebrews 11:1 the definition of faith is "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen". So anyone that has believed in any being or god that cannot be physically seen, is now represented from within the previously called "Holy Office" of the Catholic church. So as "Vicar of Christ" the pope now accepts all faiths as is. Jesus Christ did not and would not do this for Jesus himself said in John 14:6 "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the father, but by me." This is what the Catholic church once called...heresy.

-And thirdly "Promotion of Christian Unity, for Non-Christian Religions, and for Non-Believers." Ahhh...the new age unitarian dogma rears its head once again. For those of you that have read " The Rainbow Swastika" this should be deja vu. There is no way to heaven but through the Son of the living God, Jesus Christ. Again I quote John 14:6 "I am the way the truth and the life. No man cometh to the father but by me.". This is a clear contradiction of what Jesus revealed to us in truth and love. We are called to do the very same.

Adherence to the Catholic dogma is akin to denying Christ and accepting a pagan faith. But then, the Catholic church and Rome for that matter, have always been a pagan, hedonistic establishment with the label of Christianity slapped on it.


By the end of the 20th century, The Pope had become a highly revered person on the world stage and had taken the crown as the most prominent spiritual figure in existence... Even in this new millennium, the Roman Empire marches on... The completion of the elites plan to control the world is knocking on our door... But no matter the clamor or the racket from Satan and his minions, mad with greed and ambitions for total dominion... Elohim and his son Yahshua are in the place they have always been... in the still small voice, patiently awaiting the bride........ Can You Hear It??...... "You Have Been Deceived"...

The History of Christianity and The Catholic Church... Part 3

During much of what is considered the migration period (300 AD-700 AD), many different peoples moved into the region...particularly the barbarian tribes. As a result, many competing beliefs developed within the Catholic religion.

In 376, the Visigoths were the first of the barbarian tribes to officially enter Rome. Only allowed to stay under an agreement that they would defend the Danube frontier, they eventually rebelled.

By 410 AD, the Visigoths had invaded Italy, effectively sacking Rome. Soon Italy was occupied by the Ostrogoths, who were led by Theodoric the Great.

(Even though the offical Roman government eventually dissolved, the control and influence of the Catholic church continued gaining momentum. Many barbarian tribes converted over to Catholicism and consequently, influenced Catholic faith... merging much of their own traditions, just as pagan Rome had. Where do you suppose the Roman cathedrals got their "gothic" infrastructure from? The gargoyles atop many cathedrals, whose said purpose is to ward off evil spirits, was a tradition observed by the goth tribes.)

In 496 AD Clovis the I, pagan king of the Franks, converted to Catholicism. This conversion marked the beginning for much of the growth of Catholicism in the West.

In 530 AD under the rule of St. Benedict, much of the blueprint for the organization of the Catholic monastary was developed. These monastaries later became major conduits of civilization, offering agricultral and economic centers especially in remote areas of the region.

Around 600 AD, Pope Gregory the Great reformed the administrations of the church and its practices. Through his efforts, he renewed missionary efforts further spreading Catholicism outside the region. Missionaries such as Augustine of Canterbury, Ansgar, and Saint Boniface helped spread Catholic doctrine to the Anglo-Saxons, the barbarians who had occupied most of the western settlements.

In 664 AD, the "Synod of Whitby" merged the Celtic churches of Britain into Catholicism. Missionary progress and religious influence certainly was on the "up and up" for the Catholic religion, until the beginning of the 6th century when Muslims began swiftly conquering the region. (We will divulge into the Muslim religion in the next series "The History of Islam".)

By 787 AD, many conflicts in the scattered doctrinal teachings of Catholicism began to surface, and in 787 AD, the Second Council of Nicaea convened. One such dilemma among practicing Catholics was the use of images in religious practices. The Second Nicaea council ruled in favor of the use of icons, but the debate continued. So much so, that the region eventually split-in-two primarily because of the issue of icon use. (And you wonder where the Protestant churches got the idea of church denominations. Small interpreted deviations in doctrine leading to separation within the church... Most of the the church doctrine that was accepted, was accepted to appease the majority of the people simply to maintain their allegiance to the Papal throne and therefore to continue the exertion of control.)

The iconodules (supporters of icon use) had the support of most of the Byzantine emperors. This resulted in the alliance between the Pope and the Franks. Consequently, this further divided the region into papal states.

In 800 AD, The Frankish King Charlemagne was crowned the emperor of the West. During this time, Eastern and Western Christendom grew further apart. Disputes and disagreements commenced between both regions, and escalated as time progressed.

In 1054 AD, the disputes on particular jurisdictions between both East and West regions eventually resulted in the Pope and the Patriarch excommunicating one another. Considered the East-West schism, because of these actions, the East developed into the Eastern Orthodox Church and out of the West, the Catholic church was firmly established.

In 1059 AD, the college of Cardinals was developed to supposedly keep Nobility and Emperor interference from influencing papal elections.

In 1066, William the Conqueror overtook England and took the right to privately own land away from the people.

In 1095 AD, Pope Urban II spoke of the First Crusade at the Council of Clarmont, which later became known as the manuscript of illumination. The Muslim invasions were thriving and at Byzantine emperor Alexius I request, Pope Urban launched the First Crusade in an effort to return the Holy Land to Christian control.

During the following few centuries, several factions of ordered knights developed among the crusades including the Hospitallers, the Teutonic Knights, and the controversial Knights Templar.

The Templars started their order out of a desire to protect travelers on trade routes through the region but developed into noted creditors and bankers. They continued as the Knights Templar until the early 1300's, when they were supposidly wiped out by King Phillip IV of France who was in debt to the order of knights.

(Just as the Roman empire developed into the Catholic church, the Templars never actually disbanded... they went underground and re-emerged as the Rosicrucians, eventually incorporating their gnostic dogma and effectively hi-jacking the Freemasons guild in the 1600's. Soon to follow.....the establishment of the Luciferian Illuminati in the late 1700's. More on this later.)

Up until 1122 AD, it was hotly debated as to the dominance over the church by the emperor or the pope. This led to what is known as the Concordat of Worms, where it was agreed that bishops would be selected according to church law.

Catharism also emerged during the 12th century, whose doctrine included marriage prohibition, encouragement of suicide and merged asceticism with immorality. (wikipedia describes asceticism as a "life-style characterized by abstinence from various sorts of worldly pleasures [especially sexual activity and consumption of alcohol] often with the aim of pursuing religious and spiritual goals.").

In 1199 AD, King John of England acknowledging the country's bankrupt economy, declared the Law of Mortmain. This law did not allow citizens in England to pass the land they lived on to the church or anyone else without permission from the King. (Property rights had mostly been removed by the King more than a century earlier.) Pope Innocent III did not like this, as England had acquired an immense amount of debt to the Vatican.

In 1205 AD, King John further defied the Pope's authority and following the death of Archbishop of Canterbury Hubert Walker, King John refused the appointment of Stephen Langton as Hubert's successor. The Vatican, through the college of Cardinals, had chosen Langton as the Archbishop of Canterbury. This position was the ruling authority in England on behalf of Papal Rome. Remember, it was the Concordat of Worms agreement of 1122 that allowed the college of cardinals of the Catholic church to be the legal authority in the appointment of bishops.

In 1208 AD, England was placed under interdict (prohibition) and King John was excommunicated. In an attempt to regain his stature, King John groveled before the Pope and returned the title of the kingdoms of England and Ireland back to the Pope as vassals, swearing unwavering submission and loyalty to the Pope.

Ironically, in the same year, a papal legate (basically a legate is an ambassador to the Pope, addressing political issues to foreign governments on his behalf) was put to death by the Cathars and Pope Innocent III declared the Albigensian Crusade. The first inquisition was then instituted to root out and destroy the remaining Cathars. This was to be the beginning of many horrific inquisitions that would follow in an attempt to purge and purify the souls of so called "heretics".

In July of 1213 AD, King John was absolved of excommunication by acknowledging Langton as Archbishop of Canterbury. In October of that year, King John and the Pope signed a treaty, effectively ratifying the surrender of his kingdoms to the Pope, as Vicar of Christ who claimed ownership of everything and everyone on earth as tradition.

Understand that this treaty between England and Papal Rome has always stood and has never been denounced on behalf of the Catholic church. Therefore, all treaties or declarations of separation from Britain since 1213 AD (i.e. the Magna Carta and yes, our very own Declaration of Independence) are null and void!! And... any subsequent British colonies (i.e. The United States, Australia etc.) according to the treaty of 1213 AD, are property of the Pope of the Roman Catholic church on behalf of our lord Jesus Christ!!

As long as there are heirs on both sides of this contract, it remains legally binding!

(I would like to thank Ron and Mike of the net group for their help in researching the information that made this post possible.)


To Be Continued...

The History of Christianity and the Catholic Church... Part 2

In 202 AD, about the time that the Mishnah was recorded, emperor Septimius Severus banned any Roman citizen from converting to Christianity or Judaism. Those who refused to obey the emperor were often tortured by soldiers or subjected to wild animals at sporting events (The Great Roman Coliseum). Despite this brutal persecution, Christianity persevered and continued to grow in numbers. This became inherently frustrating for the Roman ruling class.

In 303 AD, the pagan Roman Empire under emperor Diocletian, made one last great attempt to exterminate Christianity. Diocletian despised the Christians. His main target was the New Testament and the documented histories of Christ. Many great publications were systematically destroyed as a result. There were thousands and thousands of Christians at the time and many of them had copies of the New Testament. Only about 5,000 manuscripts have survived and the oldest is dated some time around 350 AD.

In 306 AD, the Roman throne was seized by Constantine. Four years later, the new emperor Constantine made the practice of Christianity legal along with every other religious practice. Constantine supported Christianity, but he himself continued to worship the pagan Roman gods.

In 324 AD, Licinius ruler of Byzantine was killed by Constantine. The capital Byzantium was renamed Constantinople and became the center of the entire Roman empire. Ultimatley, this split the empire into two parts consisting of "New" Rome and "Old" Rome.

In 325 AD, consisting of 318 bishops, the Nicene Council was developed. During the bishops tenure in Nicaea, the Nicene Creed was formed and many fundamental basics of Christian doctrine were established... (such as the affirmation of Jesus Christ's divinity.)

In 337 AD, Constantine, on his death bed, called for a bishop so that he could be baptized into the church. He was the first emperor to accept Christianity and is considered as the first pope of the Catholic church. Ceasar Julius I then assumed the throne as emperor.

Prior to the time of Constantine's "conversion", Christians had been persecuted not so much for their faith in Christ, but because they refused to include pagan deities in their religious observances. With Constantine's emphasis on making his new-found Christianity palatable to the heathen in the Empire, the "Christianization" of these pagan deities and the practices therein, were facilitated. For example, pagan rituals and idols gradually took on Christian meanings and names and were incorporated into "Christian" worship (e.g., " the saints" replaced the cult of pagan gods in both worship and as patrons of cities; mother/son statues were renamed Mary and Jesus etc.). Pagan holidays were reestablished as Christian holy days (e.g., the Roman Lupercalia and the feast of purification of Isis became the Feast of the Nativity. The Saturnalia celebrations were replaced by Christmas celebrations. This is where we get December 25th as a date of celebration for Christ's birthday. (No one knows when exactly Christ was born. It is projected that Jesus was born somewhere between 6 BC and 2 AD, but due to Diocletians attempt to exterminate Christianity and its history, alot of information was lost as a result.)The ancient festival of the dead was replaced by All Souls Day and was rededicated to Christian heroes which is now called and observed as Halloween.

(Also worth noting...the supposid statue of St. Peter in the Vatican is actually not a statue of Saint Peter..but a statue of the pagan god Jupiter!)

From 375 - 383 AD, the empire was ruled by Emperor Gratian. The highest office held in the pagan pantheon was that of Pontifex Maximus or Supreme Pontiff. This position was held by the Roman Caesars. The last Caesar to hold that title was Emperor Gratian who conferred the position upon Pope Damascus. This shows the seemless transition from pagan Rome to papal Rome.

In 381 AD,(interesting that this council conferred during the transfer of title "Pontifex Maximus" to Pope Damascus) The council of Constantinople was formed. It consisted of 150 bishops... further establishing church doctrine fundamentals as dictated by the early Catholic church. Several additions and changes were made to the existing Nicene creed. It is here that the trinity of God the Father, Jesus the Son, and The Holy Spirit was established and where the Virgin Mary is parralled with the Holy Ghost. And I quote: "and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost OF THE Virgin Mary". (The Holy Ghost is defined as one with God within the creed, therefore, to parallel Mary with the Holy Ghost is to give Mary the affirmation as a deity. This is blasphemy, and the reverance of the Virgin Mary is most certainly apparent in modern day Catholic practices.) This however, is no coincidence. Just as noted previously, the worship of a mother/son deity was prominent in pagan worship well before the establishment of Christianity.
Adherance and reverance of this creed is viewed among Catholics and several other churches as necessary for salvation. This in itself is self-defeating... as stated in Romans 10:8-10...

("8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach; 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.")

No case is made biblically for an ,over-ruling, authoritarian creed that you MUST align yourself and your beliefs with to sustain salvation... but only to confess with your mouth and believe with your heart... rediculous... this spirals right back into the legalism that Jesus spoke out against concerning the Sadducees and Pharisees.

The persecution of Christians never actually ceased after its inception. During this time, only the way that Rome persecuted Christians changed. Instead of being persecuted for failure to worship pagan Roman deities, the Christians who did not agree with the particular orthodoxy backed by the Emperor were now persecuted in the name of Christ! "Christianized" Rome had become the legitimate successor of pagan Rome! This is the true origin of the Roman Catholic Church.

In 387 AD, Emperor Theodosius I deemed Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire.

In 392 AD, pagan worship within the Roman empire is officially outlawed.

To avoid legal prosecution, many Romans continued to practice pagan rituals under the projection that they were in fact "Christian". As noted above, many traditions and practices that we observe presently are a result of pagan rituals renamed and repackaged as Christian practices. Not to mention that this in some ways was intentionally done to make Christianity appealing to the masses. Just like I discussed in the last series, this is just like the "Hellenization" of Judaism. Christian and Jewish practices alike, are full of pagan influence because of the Greeks and Romans. But, this is no coincidence. Just like everything else we have covered, this is a well orchestrated plan....tactics imposed by Lucifer to disrupt God's truth and to deceive his people.

In 431 AD, another council converged. Deemed The Council of Ephesus, the councilmen reaffirmed the original Nicene creed established by the council of 325 AD. The Council of Ephesus also declared that "it is unlawful for any man to bring forward, or to write, or to compose a different faith as a rival to that established by the holy Fathers assembled with the Holy Ghost in Nicaea." Over the centuries, much controversy has risen reguarding this declaration. For instance, the addition of the Latin phrase Philioque (or "and the Son") to the procession of the Holy Spirit that is established in this creedo, has rattled the Catholic and subsequent churches since its inception in the late 5th century. To the "letter of the law"... just like the Sadducces and Pharisees.

Only a legalist who applies their own desires upon doctrine instead of applying doctrine to their desires, could possibly split the church over 3 words... Jesus certainly addressed the consequence of legalism in Matthew 15:8...

(Matthew 15:1-9 "1 Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying, 2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?4 For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.5 But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;6 And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.7 Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."

About 12 emperors ruled from the time of Pope Damascus being appointed Supreme Pontiff to when Romulus Augustulus, the final emperor of Rome, abdicated in 476 AD. These "Emperors" were only puppets who answered to the Papal dynasty. There were several barbarian invasions of Rome during this time and it were these invasions which are blamed for the supposid fall of Rome. This of course never happened.

Rome never fell...it became the Catholic church!

To Be Continued...

The History of Christianity and the Catholic Church

The history of Christianity in comparison to Judaism, is of course, rather short. However, it is imperative to understand Christianity and its progress through the last 1700 years. Many traditions that we practice as well as some symbols that we use today within the established Christian religion, are in fact pagan in their origin.

Again, if we are to stand a chance against Satan and his legions, we must understand his tactics. These rituals and incorporated practices that exist within our religion, just might be what is holding us back from achieving our full power in Jesus Christ. Remember that it is not the intentions of the Christian but the mere action that causes
manifestations in the spiritual. This is certainly the belief of the NAer's and is in fact the entire premise of their ambitions in deceiving me and you into reciting "The Great Invocation". This
recognition of action/consequence is supported in scripture as well. Despite Christ's sacrifice for our sins, it certainly does not nullify our freewill to act as we choose. Your actions most certainly have spiritual ramifications whether your intent is good or not, and the question that I raise here is...do some of the traditions that we observe as Christians have a negative spiritual impact. This is a question certainly worth exploring if our intent as a Christian is to be a disciple of Jesus Christ...

To die for Christ and his truth is something I am prepared to do...and it may be something that we as believers must do in the near future. However, we are not alone in this. Below are several accounts of Christian martyr's who died for their faith in Jesus Christ. It breaks my heart and brings tears to my eyes to read them. But I fear that as indicated by Jesus and many prophets and apostles, that we have seen nothing that will compare to what is to come in these last days. (These scriptures I will cover and more in the next series "In the days of Noah".)

The early Christians, including eleven of the twelve apostles and many of the other early disciples, faced horrible persecution and ultimately death. They were martyrs.. those who died by the hands of those who hated them for their faith in Christ Jesus. Approximately 2,000 Christians suffered martyrdom in Jerusalem during the early Christian period. Jesus Christ himself was the first martyr for God's truth and he certainly wasn't, nor is, the last. And this, as horrific as it may be,is where our history as Christians begins...

Around 34 AD, about one year after Christ's death and ressurection, Stephen was basically the outreach minister in the early church. He was in charge of the daily distribution of food. He was known as a man inspired by the spirit of God who was"full of grace and power". The Jews brought false witnesses against him, and accused him of speaking against Jewish law. Stephen stood trial before the Jewish Council. When he accused them of betraying and murdering the Messiah, Jesus Christ, he was thrown out of Jerusalem and they stoned him to death. The community of believers scattered after his death.

In 44 AD, when Herod Agrippa was appointed governor of Judea, James, the son of Zebedee and the brother to John, Andrew and Simon Peter was killed. Agrippa hated the Christian sect of Jews, and many early disciples were martyred during his rule, including Timon and Parmenas.

In 54 AD, Philip, who was a disciple from Bethsaida, the same town the sons of Zebedee were from (John, James, Andrew, and Simon Peter), was martyred at Hierapolis, in Phrygia. It is said that he went to the city of Hierapolis along with his sister Mariamme and Bartolomew preaching
the gospel of Jesus Christ. Through a miraculous healing and through his preaching of the truth, he converted the wife of the proconsul of the city. The proconsul was enraged by this and Phillip was scourged, thrown into prison, and afterwards was crucified. Mariamme, his sister, met the same fate.

Bartholomew, went on to preach in many countries and translated the Gospel of Matthew into the language of India. Later on in 73 AD, he was brutally beaten and crucified by pagans there.

Matthew, the Jewish tax-collector from Nazareth, who is believed to have written the gospel of Matthew, was hated by the Jewish scribes and Pharisees for his allegiance to Rome. Where most of the general population were illiterate, as a tax collector, Matthew was very well educated and could read and write effectively. While preaching in Ethiopia, he was murdered and impaled by a sword.

James, the brother of Jesus, was an administer of the early church in Jerusalem and authored the Epistle James. When he was 94 years old, he was beat and stoned, and had his head crushed with a fuller's club.

Matthias the apostle, was chosen by the remaining eleven desciples to replace Judas Iscariot. Judas Iscariot was the man that betrayed Jesus and handed him over to the Jews that were conspiring against him. Judas eventually commited suicide out of guilt. Ultimately, Matthias the
twelfth disciple, was stoned in Jerusalem and then beheaded.

Simon Peter, who is according to the Roman Catholics, the very first pope of the Roman Catholic church (this certainly is not historically sound) was a fisherman by trade. His brother was Andrew and they both were sons of Zebedee, as were James and John. They ran a fishing buisness out of Bethsaida. When Jesus came to them as they were fishing, this is where he told them in Matthew 4:18 that he would make them "fishers of men" and from then on they followed Jesus as his first disciples. Peter's fate was eventually met and he was crucified upside down on a cross at his request. He did so because he did not feel worthy enough to be crucified in the same manner that his Lord Jesus Christ had been.

Andrew, the brother of Peter and a friend of John the Baptist, preached the gospel throughout Asia. He was arrested in Edessa and crucified on a cross, the two ends of which were fixed transversely in the ground. (To the Catholics this is considered St. Andrew's Cross)

Mark, who was converted to Christianity by Peter, transcribed Peter’s account of Jesus in the Gospel of Mark. Mark evangelized with Paul and his brother Barnabas throughout their ministry. When Barnabas seperated from Paul over a dispute about Jews and Gentiles, Mark went with him. Paul later called on Mark's services again and Mark became Paul's fellow worker. Mark was literally ripped to pieces by the people of Alexandria in front of their pagan idol Serapis.

Paul of Tarsus, who is called "Blessed Paul" and known as Saint Paul to the Catholics, was responsible for much of The New Testament which is comprised of Paul's letters or epistles written to many communities he helped establish thoughout the region. Early on in his life, Paul helped in persecuting the Christians, but one day traveling to Damascus, he had a vision in which Jesus spoke to him and asked Paul why he was persecuting him...Paul saw the truth and he converted and began helping Jesus Christ's cause. Three years after his conversion he went to Jerusalem where he met James and he stayed with Simon Peter for 15 days. After his departure, He did not return from his travels to Jerusalem for another 14 years. Paul spent the rest of his life thinking and writing about Christianity and converted many to the faith. Around 60 AD, 14 years after leaving, Paul returned to Jerusalem bringing money, which he had acquired, to help the congregation there. Blessed Paul was arrested and detained for two years. Facing his martyrdom, Paul’s faith was so dramatic that the authorities took him to a private location to be executed by the sword.

Most of these great men died during the reign of the evil Emperor Nero.

Jude, who was of course the author of the epistle Jude, was known as "the brother of James" and was commonly called Thaddeus. As noted, Jude is sometimes mistaken as the brother of James, but this is a doing all his own. Jude was actually a brother of Jesus. He acknowledged his sin and did not feel worthy enough to be called the brother of the only Son of God, so in his own epistle Jude, he humbly names himself the Brother of James. In 72 AD, Jude was crucified in Edessa, a large christian community at the time.

Thomas, who was called Didymus, preached the Gospel in Parthia and India. His activity enraged the pagan priests and he was martyred by being thrust through with a spear.

Luke, who was the author of the Gospel of Luke, also traveled with Paul through various countries preaching the gospel of our Lord. He was eventually hung on an olive tree by idolatrous priests in Greece.

Simon, who was called Zelotes, preached the Gospel in Mauritania, Africa and Britain...where in 74 AD, he was crucified.

John, the brother of James, who was considered the "beloved disciple", was ordered out of Ephesus to go to Rome. It is here that he was cast into a cauldron of boiling oil. By the power and grace of God, he escaped without injury. He was later banished to the Isle of Patmos by Domitian, where he wrote the Book of Revelation. This was the only apostle who escaped a violent death.

This is just a small list of those who were killed for Jesus' sake....most of which were crucified on a cross. This is where I get uneasy about the use of a cross as a spiritual symbol for us as Christians. Do you think the early Christians would have paraded around a Roman crucifix as a symbol for faith in Jesus when they had seen their friends and savior painfully die by that same cross? I believe it would have been considered heresy by the early Christians. Keep in mind it was the Catholics, or "Christianized" pagan Romans, that introduced the cross as a Christian symbol. Visualize a Catholic procession with the symbol of the cross being carried by an acolyte, leading the priest into the sanctuary. The Romans martyred most Christians on the cross, and when I see a procession, it says to me "here comes Rome and its heirarchy guided by a cross which has ruled you and your Messiah!!" Its almost a slap in the face to Christians everywhere. To me this symbolizes Rome's power and rule over the Christian faith and its practices. As I will talk about later in the series... Rome never actually fell.... it became the Catholic church!

(I do have a cross and I know alot of people use a cross as a representation for Jesus' sacrifice for our salvation... but I want people to have an understanding that the symbology of many things we see and use today, finds its roots in paganism, occultism and ultimately the progressive New Age. More on this later as well.)

The Roman empire was seemingly successful in attempting to "purge" the empire of Christians and Jews. It was around this time also that the 2nd Temple was ransacked and demolished by the Romans. Many Jews and Christians died and continued to die at the hands of the Romans during this period. Despite this however, the Jews continued to persecute and kill the Christians for the same reason that they were being killed and persecuted........ for their faith.

To Be Continued...

The History of Judaism and its Modern Day Implications... Part 3

As history shows, Judaism has fallen victim to influence from many pagan cultures and beliefs on numerous accounts. The real problem lies in the fact that much of these practices have in some form or another been incorporated into Judaism over time. As I left off with the Mishnah and Talmud in Part 2 of the series, I will begin this section discussing the controversy shrouding the Kabbalah and its invasion of the Jewish faith with the birth of "Jewish Mysticism". There is a significant gap in the timeline here, but I will cover Judaism during the span of 300 AD to the 13th century in the next series that will explain the history of Christianity and the Catholic church. The Catholic church most certainly finds its roots in paganism/occultism. More on that later...

The Kabbalah's orgins are as mysterious as are the reasons that it is even practiced within Judaism. It is considered to be part of the Oral Law (the Mishnah) and is somewhat of a commentary of the Torah (First 5 books of the Old Testament) just as the Talmud is commentary of the Mishnah. The Kabbalah stresses reasons for an understanding of the events found in the Torah using mystical interpretations. It concerns topics such as the understanding of the spiritual spheres in creation and the ways in which God's universe works.
There are various legends concerning the origin of the Kabbalah. Most practitioners of the Kabbalah maintain it came from God. Some say God gave it directly to Adam, while others claim God taught it to a select angelic group. These angels later were kicked out of heaven in Lucifer's rebellion and became known as the "fallen angels". Afterwards the fallen angels taught it to Adam, the disobedient child on earth in order to furnish humankind with the means to return to their nobility and felicity. Really?? by FALLEN angels?? (I would like to point out that this is the belief that will lay the ground work for my explaination of how it was "in the days of Noah". Note that they claim it was the "fallen angels" that divulged this information to man and was passed on through the generations. But I will get into that topic later.) It then passed to Noah, to Abraham and Moses. Moses included the first four books of the Pentateuch, leaving out Deuteronomy, in the Kabbalah before he initiated seventy Elders into it. The Elders initiated others into it. Some even claim that David and Solomon were Kabbalistic adepts.
Supposidly, legend has it that when Abraham immigrated to Egypt and leaked some of the sacred teaching, that the Egyptians learned a portion of the knowledge. It was from Egypt that other Eastern cultures acquired the knowledge and adopted it into their philosophical systems. Moses, being privy to all Egyptian wisdom was first initiated into the Kabbalah in the land of his birth and later became more proficient in it during his wondering in the desert wilderness. It is also claimed by some that alot of this mystical wisdom was learned when Moses recieved the written and oral laws from God during his 40 days atop Mt. Sinai.

As can be seen, the Kabbalah is very much akin to Gnosticism (or knowledge of God. This of course is the foundation of Freemasonry).(Interestingly enough, some Freemasons claim that Solomon along with the 1st temple's architect Hiram, were the first Freemasons. And as noted previously, he was supposidly a student of Kabbalah as well. Funny how both of these practices seemingly parrallel one another. As you will see though, every pagan religion that exists, parrallels the ancient traditions that were supposidly imparted to man by "God" or by "fallen angels" in one form or another.) In both, sacred knowledge which God withheld from man was given to him by his adversary; the serpent in the Garden who tempted Eve, and the fallen angels who gave humankind the Kabbalah. The Freemasons (Gnostics) declare that it was Lucifer, the light-bearer, who gifted mankind with this wisdom in order that man find his inner godhood and as stated in Genesis 3, "be as gods". ( Note: it is this belief that is the core of the New Age Doctrine and almost every other occultic faith. Again, much more on that later.) The Kabbalah's mystical content is based on wisdom that was imparted by the "fallen angels" and passed down, yet it is argued by those who practice it that it came from God. (In fact, some believe that as part of the oral law found in the Mishnah, the Kabbalah consists of the mystical interpretations of such laws.) There is nothing biblical about mysticism. But, just like the Freemasons seek a "knowledge of God", of what "God" do they truly speak of?

During Christ's time around 30 AD and there after,both Gnosticism and the teachings of the Kabbalah were popular in the countries of the eastern Mediterranean. Those holding to either teaching believed they were the "elect" because they were enlightened by possessing the knowledge of the divine; those possessing such knowledge were transformed-to know God is to be God. Hello pantheism and New Age dogma...

Claiming "God" as the source of this wisdom is certainly a deception perpetrated by the enemy. This has decieved many people into accepting these practices and incorporating them into their own faith simply based on the principle that it originated from "God". Paul warned us to "test the spirits" as stated in 1 John 4:1"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world." Also, Jesus told us that it is by the fruits (deeds) of others that you will know the source of those deeds. (Matthew 7:20 "Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.") We must be wise and use the Holy Spirit, which Jesus sent to us after he accended to heaven, to decern from what is of creator God and what is not. In these last days, we are warned of a mass deception that blankets the earth and how we are to refrain from it and be prepared for his return. (Matthew 24:4-8 "4And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. 6And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
7For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. 8All these are the beginning of sorrows.")

Before Jesus accended, of every question he could ask his disciples, he asked if he would find FAITH upon his return as stated in Luke 18:8 "Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?" Hebrews 11:1 defines faith for us... "Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." According to this scripture our hope IS our proof. This would indicate that the faith you have, is planted by God. The more you seek him, the more faith that you will be granted. SEEK HIM. Our wisdom comes from God. Those who seek godhood are on a never ending track for god-knowledge, using texts like the Kabbalah in an attempt to harness this god wisdom. We as children of God must search HIM for our wisdom... not some mystical text.

Throughout its history, Kabbalists have chosen to keep their esoteric interpretations of the Torah hidden from the general populace and religious leaders. Many Kabbalists were persecuted and many others knew that their teachings contradicted accepted Jewish and Christian theologies. So, they practiced a self-imposed silence. Kabbalah however, continued to be passed down through the centuries.

Supposidly, the earliest documented Kabbalistic writing is called the "Sepher Yetzirah", or "the book of creation". One tradition claims that Abraham wrote the book and placed it within a cave. It was later discovered and published as the Sepher Yetzirah.

The Sefer Yetzirah claims that God created the world by the means of thirty-two secret paths of knowledge which are the ten Sephirah and the twenty-two letters in the Hebrew alphabet. ( Also worth noting...The Hebrew alphabet and their relationship to numbers is how "the bible codes" have been deciphered in scripture.) It is believed that the ten Sephirah forming the Sephiroth were originally thought as referring to numbers but later representing emanations from which the cosmos was formed. This worldview presented is currently found in the modern interpretation of the Kabbalah.

In the 13th century, what is known as the "ecstatic" or "prophetic" Kabbalah appeared which emphasized a visionary and experiential aspect relying on novel approaches to the Hebrew alphabet and numbers as sources of the divine truth. These conceptions were mainly those of Rabbi Abraham Abulafia, a mystic , and represent the mystic tendencies among the Kabbalists instead of theosophical and traditional speculations.

In the 14th century, Moses De Leon, a spanish Kabbalist and student of Rabbi Abraham Abulafia, constructed the Zohar. This publication is extremely influential in modern Kabbalistic philosophy. Moses claimed that he had found the scrolls that the Zohar was comprised of and that they had been written more than a thousand years earlier. However recent scholars suggest that it was Moses ,that in fact, wrote the Zohar.

By the 16th century, the culmination of the modern Kabbalah had influences from Kabbalists such as John Dee, a mathematician and geographer, and Isaac Luria who is revered as the greatest Kabbalist of modern times. It was during this time that the Hasidic movement emerged, making the Kabbalah accessible to the masses. The Hasidims were considered Jewish Mystics. This Jewish Mysticism is very much alive and being practiced today.

By the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, many more Kabbalists had influenced the Kabbalah's development such as Gaon of Vilna in the 1800's and Rabbi Ashlag well into the 1900's.

Today the Kabbalah has been popularized and has gained tremendous popularity even with some celebrities. For instance, Britney Spears and Madonna both practice Kabbalah traditions. This popularization is condemned by traditional Jewish Kabbalists and they claim it is a misrepresentation of authemtic Kabbalah philosophy. Despite this, the modern Kabbalah IS a work in New Age philosophy. The Zohar is at the heart of Kabbalah practices and it explores New Age philosophy such as reincarnation, inner divinity, and pantheism. The bottomline is that the modern Kabbalah has inevitably evolved from one heresy deeper into another and its mysticism is certainly not biblical. I believe there may be some ancient truths of the Jewish Oral traditions within the Kabbalah, after all the Kabbalah is as much a commentary as the Talmud. However, the current Kabbalah and its implementation and promotion of Mysticism is nothing more than a collection of paganistic evil. This is a prime example of how the New Agers have infultrated Judaism and distorted God's truth.

The History of Judaism and its Modern Day Implications... Part 2

The unfortunate events that have happened to the Jewish people throughout history are indeed heart-wrenching. In most all the occasions of these traumatic events, the reason for such occurances rested on the fact that the Jews had turned their back on God, entertaining pagan practices and in doing so, lost God's blessing and protection. Even so, I feel such grief in my spirit seeing the seemingly endless fighting, death, separation, and exclusion of God's chosen people. My heart goes out to them even though most of what was true orthodox Judaism is gone. The enemy has wrought destruction and pillaged these people over many, many centuries and in doing so has destroyed much of the original Jewish religion. However, we are assured that before God's final judgement, that he will stay true to his covenant despite many Jews not honoring that promise. Jesus will ultimately be revealed to them and the Jewish people will accept Jesus as their prophesied Messiah. Zechariah 12:10 ("And I will pour out upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn.")

The Roman Era:

In 63 BCE, the civil war between the two Jewish factions ended with the Roman occupation of Jerusalem. There was much unrest amongst the Jews following the Roman general Pompey's defilement of the Temple, to which the Pharisees attributed to Sadducee misrule. Pompey was beseeched by the Pharisees and named Hyrcanus High Priest.

In 40 BCE, Antigonus, Aristobulus's son, overthrew him and decreed himself king and High Priest. After this Herod (military governor of Galilee) fled to Rome. In Rome, Herod sought the support of Mark Antony and Octavian which secured his recognition by the Roman senate as king. Over the years, Herod was heavily disliked as a ruler, but treated the Pharisees more favorably than the Sadducees partially because of Antigonus defiance. The Pharisees ultimately opposed Herod because the family of Boethus, who Herod appointed to the priesthood, revived the spirit of the Sadducees and conflict continued.

In 4 BCE, Herod died. In response, several Jewish elements began a 2 year revolt. The Syrian legate Publius Quinctilius Varus took control of Judea and immediatly crushed the revolt killing thousands of Jews and selling many into slavery. Rome quickly re-established control and divided Herod's kingdom amongst his sons: Archelaus received the southern part of the territory (Judea and Samaria), Herod Antipas (King Herod, who sent the Jews that sought to have Jesus killed, back to Pontius Pilate despite Pilate initially sending the Jews to him.) became tetrarch of the Galilee and the southern Transjordan (Peraea), and Philip received the northern Transjordan (Batanaea).

In 6 AD, Archelaus (ruler over Judea and Samaria) was antagonistic towards the Jews just as his father was. The emperor Augustus placed Judea and Samaria under the indirect rule of a Roman procurator and the direct rule of a Roman-appointed high priest instead. At the time the primary tasks of the appointed High Priest was to collect tribute to the Roman emperor, convince the Romans not to interfere with the Temple, and ensure that the Jews not rebel.
It should be noted that the sanhedrin was primarily influenced by the Sadducees. But during the Roman period, the power of the sanhedrin was severly limited. The pharisees however, never really were a political influence, but were very popular as teachers and interpreters of Jewish law. Their power resided in their ability to persuade.

By 66 AD, Jewish discontent with Roman rule had escalated. At first, the priests (Saduccees) tried to suppress rebellion, even calling upon the Pharisees for help. After the desecration of a Jewish synagogue in Caesarea by Hellenists, the high priest suspended tribute to the emperor and what is known as the Great Jewish revolt, began. During this time a sect of Jews emerged known as the revolutionaries and it encompassed what were known as "the Zealots" and "the Sicarri". These sects developed specifically to fight Rome.

In 70 AD, the Romans crushed the revolt and rendered the 2nd Temple to rubble, utterly destroying it. The Zealots, of the revolutionaries, had been wiped out completely by 73 AD.
This was a devistating event for the Jews. The Sadducees whos teaching were so closely connected to the Temple, dissolved out of existance. The Essenes too disappeared, as the Romans eventually sacked their settlement in Qumran. (Some of the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in 1947 by a local shepard boy in a cave near Qumran. It is believed that the Essenes put the scrolls in caves in the area around Qumran to save them from Roman destruction.) Eventually all that remained were the Pharisees, and it was out of the Pharisees that Rabbinic

Judaism emerged and centuries later, turned into normative Judaism.

To show just how traumatic this event was, below is an account of the 2nd temple's destruction... Rabbi Spiro of aish.com has done an incredibly in depth study of Judaisms history. He gives the accounts of the Roman historian Deo Cassius and the controversial historian Josephus...

"A horrific slaughter ensues with the Romans taking the city, literally house-by-house. One of the excavations that gives testimony to the destruction is the famous "Burnt House" which is open to visitors in Old City Jerusalem today. Here the skeletal remains of a woman's arm were found where she died on the doorstep of her house, with a spear still lying nearby.
Despite the determined resistance of the Jewish defenders Titus slowly works his way to the Temple Mount. Now a duel to the death ensues, and finally, five months after the Romans had begun this attack Titus orders the Second Temple razed to the ground. The day is the 9th of Av, the very same day on which the First Temple was destroyed."

A roman by the Name of Deo Cassius states,

"The populace was stationed below in the court and the elders on the steps and the priests in the Sanctuary itself. And though they were but a handful fighting against a far superior force, they were not conquered until part of the Temple was set on fire. Then they met their death willingly, some throwing themselves on the swords of the Romans, some slaying one another, others taking their own lives and still others leaping into the flames. And it seemed to everybody and especially to them that so far from being destruction, it was victory and salvation and happiness to them that they perished along with the Temple." All of the neighboring countryside is denuded of whatever trees remained from the siege to create the giant bonfire to burn the buildings of the Temple to the ground. The intense heat from the fire causes the moisture in the limestone to expand and it exploded like popcorn, producing a chain reaction of destruction. In a day's time, the magnificent Temple is nothing but rubble. "

Josephus describes the destruction of the Temple:

"While the holy house (The Temple) was on fire, everything was plundered that came to hand, and ten thousand of those that were caught were slain; nor was there a commiseration of any age...but children and old men...and priests, were all slain in the same manner....The flame was also carried a long way, and made an echo, together with the groans of those who were slain...one would have thought the whole city would have been on fire. Nor can one imagine anything greater and more terrible than this noise.""

For years to come, dispair and defeat hung over the Jews.

In 132 AD, Emperor Hadrian threatened to rebuild Jerusalem as a pagan city dedicated to Jupiter and leading sages of the Sanhedrin backed a rebellion led by Simon Bar Koziba. A short-lived independant state was established that lasted for only 3 years.

In 135 AD, the Romans conquered the independant state and brutally executed Simon and ten leading members of the Sanhedrin. Romans then forbade Jews to enter Jerusalem and forbade any plan to rebuild the Temple. Directly taking over Judea, Rome renamed Jerusalem.. Aelia Capitolina. Under the leadership of Judah haNasi, Romans reconstitued the Sanhedrin and Judah's sons served as heads within the Sanhedrin.

In 200 AD, due to the fear that the Oral Law would be lost (Jews were still being persecuted by the Romans, and not many experts on the interpretation of Oral Law remained.) Judah and a group of sages, for the first time in history, documented the Oral Law into a book known to Jews as the Mishnah. Not unlike the Pharisees, the sages and scribes debated on interpretation and application of the Mishnah as time progressed.

In 400 AD, these debates, stories, and commentaries from various Rabbi on the Mishnah were culminated into a publication known as the Talmud. There were 2 seperate Talmuds from 2 seperate regions. During this time, the Palestinian Talmud emerged and a century later the Babylonian Talmud was created, touting further commentary on the Mishnah. Ever since, the Misnah has continued to be debated and studied for its applications. The belief in the Oral Law being evolutionary, in that its wisdom continues to build on itself through continual revelation and application, traces back to the Pharisees and was a prominent part of Jewish life then, through the centuries, and still is today in Orthodox Judaism.

To Be Continued...

The History of Judaism and its Modern Day Implications...

In order to fully understand what has been discussed in "the deception brought to light" series, which covered the book "The Rainbow Swastika", I feel it is also necessary to cover briefly the history of Judaism. It is of great consequence to our current way of life as Christians and how the ideas and thoughts which gave birth to our faith, evolved over time. It is for this reason, that I have exhaustively researched this and now divulge that information to you. It is also important to understand how all of this connects with the New Age's attempt to destroy the foundations of Orthodox Judaism and in turn the foundations of Christianity. It is alarmingly apparent, certainly considering Hannah Newman's research in the Rainbow Swastika, that the NAM is dramatically threatened by God and his chosen and will decieve and ultimately kill to destroy these foundations.

The Kabbalah is one such Jewish text that I have been researching, and in essense, is a work resulting from the infultration of mysticism into Orthodox Judaism and its ancient texts. Mysticism throughout history has encompassed many forms, through many cultures...teachings which, in colaboration with many other pagan rituals and practices, later culminate into beliefs such as pantheism (belief that we as individuals are god in and of ourselves),and ultimatley New Age Theosophy. It is this information that is critical when understanding that what is going
on now in our world has been going on in one form or another since the time of Nimrod and Babylon. Much of what the world was before the Great Flood... the practices at the time, in which were a complete abomination to God... certainly were the cause of it and is where every established ancient religion post-dating the Flood derived their mystic practices and beliefs... A knowledge which was passed down through the generations of man from the serpent's declaration to man that is stated in Genesis 3:1-6 ("1 Now the serpent was more subtil than
any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? 2And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: 3But of the fruit of the tree which is in
the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. 4And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 5For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and [YE SHALL BE AS GODS], knowing good and evil." )That is why I stress the importance of Matthew 24:37 ("But as the days of Noe (Noah) were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.") But, to understand what it was like in "the Days of Noah", I feel that a brief explaination of our Jewish brethren's history is needed.

As I will reveal in this series, an astounding history precedes the Jewish people. However, I will only be tracing back to the era of the 2nd temple which follows the events of the Old Testament. The occurances during the 1st temple era can of course be found there...

The Persian Era:

In 539 BCE, the Persians conquered Babylon. (The Jews of course were in exile in Babylon at the time and it was the Babylonians under King Nebuchadnezzar that conquered the region previously and destroyed Solomon's Temple in 586 BCE. The Ark of the Covenant disappeared after the destruction of the 1st Temple and to this day it is a mystery as to its whereabouts.)

In 537 BCE, Cyrus the Great allowed the Jews to return to Judea and rebuild the Temple but did not allow the re-establishment of a Jewish monarchy such as one finds with King David or King Solomon. This left the preists as the dominant authority of the Jewish people. It was
around this time that the Sadduccee party emerged as the party of priests and the elites. Much debate occured however, over the legitimacy of the 2nd temple due to it being construted under the auspices of a foreign empire. This began to pave the way for separate ideologies and the development of different sects within the Jewish faith as we will see.Also established during this time out of the scribes and sages (later known as the Rabbi), who were considered the experts on Jewish law and its interpretations, was the party of the Pharisees.

The Hellenistic Era:

*It should be noted that it was during this era that the separation between the priests (Sadducee's) and the scribes and sages (Pharisee's) became much more apparent. The Pharisee's upheld the Oral Tradition of Judaism which was taught by word of mouth, passed down through the generations from the time of Moses. It is held that the Oral law was given to Moses at the same time that the Written law was given to him. The main difference being that the Sadducees did not revere the Oral Law and took the Torah very literal in translation. For Instance, as justification of "an eye for an eye" it would be translated by a Pharisee as something of relative value in retribution for the plucking out of someone's eye... where as a Sadducee would require that the assailant have one of his/her own eyes removed.

In 332 BCE, Alexander the Great conquered the Persian Empire. When he died in 323 BCE, the empire was divided amongst his generals. At the time, Judea was ruled by the Egyptian-Hellenic Ptolemies.

In 198 BCE, the Syrian-Hellenic Seleucid Empire, which was ruled by Antiocus III, seized control of Judea. Understand that during this time the region was very diverse. Several languages and beliefs existed in the area. These pagan influences worked their way into the Jewish faith and this is where alot of mysticism polluted Judaism. This type of Judaism is refered to as "Hellenistic Judaism". (Hellenization is the indoctrination of Greecian culture and religious beliefs). Some sects of Judaism were affected more than others, but all sects of Judaism were affected in some way during this period. There was a dividing line however, between those that supported hellenization of Judaism (those in favor of the Seleucids) and those that defied it (those who supported the Ptomelies).

In 175 BCE, the High Priest of the time Simon II died and conflict developed between the supporters of his son Onias III (who oposed Hellenization, and favored the Ptolemies) and his son Jason (who favored hellenization of Judaism and the Seleucids). The result of
which brought about a brief civil war. Huge numbers of the Jewish population flocked to Jason's side.

In 167 BCE, the Seleucid king Antiochus IV invaded Judea, desecrated the Temple and forcefully imposed hellenism, requiring Jews to abandon their laws and customs. In response, Mattathias and his 5 sons, a family of priests at the time, began a bloody revolt against the
Seleucid empire.

In 165 BCE, Jerusalem was liberated and the Temple was restored. Fighting continued however and two of Mattathias sons, Judah and Johnathan, were killed. It was also at this time that the Great Sanhedrin was established.The Sanhedrin was a court of 71 members that met on fixed occasions in the Temple of Jerusalem, acting as a religious legislative body, trial court, and administrator of rituals. Members included the High Priest and former High Priests; members of the priestly line; community elders and heads of tribes and families, all being knowledgeable and experienced in the Jewish Law.

In 141 BCE, an assembly of priest made Simon, one of Mattathia's sons, High Priest and leader.This was to begin what is known as the Hasmonean dynasty.

In 135 BCE, Simon was killed and his son John inherited the position.

By 152 BCE, the Seleucids had been defeated and a type of monarchy was once again formed under the Hasmonean dynasty.The gap between the Pharisees and Sadducees during the Hellenization period widened substantially. It was out of this period that the Essenes (the community responsible for the Dead Sea Scrolls) evolved which consisted of dissident priests that rejected the ideologies of the other sects even claiming that the second temple was illegitimate due the fact that the Ark of the Covenant was not present. They believed that their community represented the new Temple and that their obedience to the law was a new type of sacrifice. Sometime During the Hasmonean period, a Pharisee suggested to the Hasmonean king at the time, Alexander Jannaeus, that he should choose between being king or High Priest. In response he openly sided with the Sadducees by adopting their rites. This caused a riot in the Temple and caused a brief civil war that repressed the Pharisees. On his deathbed, king Alexander called for reconcilliation between both parties. At his death, his wife, Salome Alexander succeeded him. Salome's brother Shimon was a leading Pharisee and during this time the Pharisees gained tremendous political power, especially in the Sanhedrin institution. When she died, her son Hyrcanus sought support from the Pharisees and the younger son, Aristobulus, sought support from the Sadducees. This conflict culminated into yet another civil war.

To be continued...

The deception brought to light... Part 10

Here is the conclusion to this brilliant publication on the NAM. I applaud Hannah Newman for her commitment on this work. It has certainly blessed me with an in-depth insight into the NAM's diabolical plans for humanity. My very life has changed from reading it, as I hope it has done the same for anyone else reading it. In retrospect, I can agree with Hannah here... Our best defense against the NAM is a working knowledge of what the NAM is doing and where its influence is. Once you know of its tactics...you can sniff it out. My greatest concern is however... is that I'm having trouble finding anything that is, in some form, untainted by NA theosophy. It is the coming upon of this revelation that will change the way that you see things in our twisted world, forever.

And so... In conclusion...

THE RAINBOW SWASTIKA REPORT TO THE JEWISH PEOPLE ABOUT NEW AGE ANTISEMITISM

by Hannah Newman -- freeway@netvision.net.il

"One key question always seemed unanswerable: 'If I don't like the world government, or it doesn't like me, where do I go then?'" (Harlan Cleveland, _The Birth of a New World_, 1993, p.62)

"You will hide [those who trust in You] in the secret place of Your Presence...." (David, King of Israel, _Psalms_ 31:20)

Site: http://philologos.org/__eb-trs/naJ.htm

J. What to Do: A Jewish Response

To date I have not seen a single Jewish response to the threat which the New Age Plan poses to our people, not to mention the rest of mankind. I have no idea why.
Truth be told, I feel like David might have felt watching Goliath taunt "the armies of the living G-d" with no one to answer the challenge. More accurately, I'm blown away with the realization that hardly anyone has even noticed that there's a Goliath standing there.
I realize that some Jews are going to squirm uneasily at my personal response. Some will accuse me of "preaching", as though prophetic-style warnings and urgings were the sole domain of evangelical Christians. Whose prophets are they, anyway? Some will say it is not a "Jewish" response because it is too "spiritual". To these, I can only suggest that we listen carefully to the New Agers, who may see our weaknesses better than we do: Alice Bailey always said that the Jews tend to deal with a spiritual problem on a rationalistic, material level. And we do. Throw money at it, convene a conference, set up committees, file the reports. Maybe even launch an educational program. But meanwhile the real battlefield, which begins and ends in the individual spirit, remains abandoned to our sworn cosmic enemies... to their smug delight.
It wasn't always that way with the Jewish people. Our own Book is filled with stories of battles waged by Jews who knew how to fight on the ground and in the spirit as well. Our most celebrated king, David son of Jesse, did not hesitate to combine the two strategies, a discipline which he learned long before his ascension to the throne. To his dying day, he attributed his success to a relationship with that same Entity who is so hated by our New Age adversaries. There were prophets too, whose bold words and acts of faith we all look upon as some kind of inheritance, whether we believe them or not. But today's Jews who take those Bible stories as historical fact, who relate to its advice and promises like money in the bank, are considered a bit out of touch by their more "rational" brethren.
Well, as humbling as it may be, a realistic grasp on life - particularly Jewish or Israeli life - requires acknowledging that some of what we Jews experience supersedes rational comprehension. The presence of an identifiable Jewish people, through 4000 years and repeated attempts at annihilation, is itself a historical fact that defies rational explanation. It has no historical parallel. Let's consider for a moment all you skeptical, secular readers out there who still cling to the label "Jew" in the year 2000: just explaining you requires more than a rational answer.
So here I offer my response, after coming to terms personally with all that awaits the Jewish people in the Age of Aquarius. In a word, the only antidote for New Age "transformation" is a very Old Age concept: Restoration. Let's get back to the place we belong spiritually.
The process of Restoration begins within and moves progressively outward, as follows:

1. Restoring Your Own Jewish Spirituality - for Secular Jews

1a. "Where did we go wrong?" Many concerned Jews have been asking themselves this question while watching this generation stampede into Eastern religious cults, into intermarriage, into anything that comes along, leaving their people far behind without a thought. Some of you may have asked it while reading this series, coming to the realization that we have been heavily sabotaged from within the community as well as outside... and we never even noticed. You deserve an answer. An answer that goes beyond the material "solutions" we are so fond of implementing and get such meager results from.
The New Agers are right about one thing: the answer will come from within. Not in the sense they mean: we don't have "all the answers" within us. But we do have the one answer which will trigger our deliverance. It is actually the answer to two questions: "Where did we go wrong?" -- and the one G-d always asks when His people go wrong: "Where are you?"
We went wandering off, and now we're lost.... (If we weren't lost, Hannah's series would be unnecessary....)
Okay, okay - I'm lost. I see this tidal wave coming our way, and I have no idea which way to run.

This is the only answer we can offer with any authority. But it's the only answer which our G-d needs from us in order to step into the picture. Either that's our answer, or we can continue to nurse our pride, tell ourselves that everything is okay, that we're not lost. The Jewish population worldwide is growing, antisemitism is dying out, and we are in no danger at all from these New Age "fringe lunatics" in the UN, the educational system, the media and the synagogues.... Who are we kidding?
Restoring the Jewish community starts with yourself. It's "I" plus "you" that makes "we". If "we" are ever going to regain the ground lost to NA in our community, we're going to have to dig down to the very bedrock - whatever it was that kept the Jewish people alive for all this time - and reclaim what we lost. Personally.
And if you're wondering how to find your way back to that bedrock, the NAers have betrayed their knowledge of what and where it is. It's the only thing they truly fear. They are frantically trying to demolish it, before we wake up and catch on. It's Jewish faith in the one and only G-d. Not a life dedicated to understanding the Mishneh and Gemara - that doesn't threaten The Plan in the least. What scares them is the in-their-face kind of faith you read about in the Torah and Prophets, the kind of faith that carries no fear or doubt because it can see Who is on top. Tidal wave or not. It is my conviction that G-d knew long ago what we would face in every generation, including this ultimate challenge to our spiritual and physical survival. That being so, He embedded advice for us in the words of His prophets. As you will see, the few examples I include below are amazingly relevant in their choice of words. Coincidence? How could our prophets of millennia past have known the very terminology the Hierarchy would use today in their bid to re-open their ancient war? The writers of the Bible couldn't have known, but the Opponent of the Hierarchy certainly would have - He "sat [as King] for the Flood" (_Psalms_ 29:10, literal translation), the last encounter where the Hierarchy admits being defeated by the Force behind the Jews. Strengthen your personal faith in your G-d. Regardless of your attitude toward Jewish religious tradition, take time to study the many historical accounts of attempts to annihilate the Jews and their G-d (for these two are linked by our enemies without exception), and what caused these attempts to fail. Whether you choose Biblical incidents or those from history (from the Maccabees to modern Israel), you will notice a pattern. It consists of a few courageous people fighting against impossible odds, plus some mysterious turn of events which evened the odds for them. The people involved were not often impressive physically or mentally, but they distinguished themselves in their willingness to sacrifice their lives, if necessary, to cling to the G-d of Israel, to the same old patch of ground in the Middle East, or to their Jewishness (which in the end all amounts to the same thing, considering how the Jews came to be in the first place). While many did indeed give up their lives, many more survived to relate unusual circumstances of deliverance and even outright supernatural intervention. This is documented in every war the modern State of Israel has fought, including the 1991 Gulf War.
Consider the alternatives for the future. In the interests of realism, let us acknowledge that, based on the evidence, there is no chance of surviving this New World Order on our own strength. Either the New Age Plan will succeed in making the world "judenrein", or our G-d will even the odds once again. If we don't believe that Israel has a G-d, we might as well dismantle the State of Israel, delete Passover from our calendars, apologize to Hitler, take our "karma medicine" and leave the world without a fuss. Even if we should believe that G-d is not real, the New Age very definitely believes it. They also know about our being chosen by G-d as His instruments in the world, and they will not rest until they "seal the door" to that hated Force - down to the last Jew. In the event that you do not believe in G-d, yet you do believe that the Jewish people is a historically valid entity, and that we have every right to perpetuate our identity, then you are left with explaining why. What history or origins will you base your conviction on? To what can you attribute the crazy staying power of a people who hold the record as the all-time favorite target for annihilation - including several efforts at self-erasure? If you don't fall back on some kind of Higher Power as an explanation, your rational processes will begin to suffer from cognitive dissonance. Of course you can always accept the humbling but satisfying answer that the G-d of Israel lives. Not that we understand everything He has done with our people, but He is apparently there - and involved. He's been keeping some very unlikely promises, in the face of some very impressive opposition. He is not daunted by His own people's skeptism, or their outright denial of His existence. His promises include dealing a final blow to "the wise men of Babylon" who "rule the whole earth" [never achieved until this day of global culture] and "the daughter of the Kasdim" with her "sorceries" (Jer. 50 and 51, Isa. 14 and 47). It is noteworthy that "Helel ben Shahar", the New Agers' "light-bearer", receives judgment from G-d as the king of Babylon (Isa. 14:3-23).

2. Restoring Your Own Jewish Spirituality - for Observant Jews
"Have I been taught real Torah?" You may have never questioned whether what you have absorbed is really a Jewish faith, especially if you are in orthodox circles. But since New Agers are boasting control of the culture we have grown up in, and even penetration into the Torah community, it's time to investigate.
Is everything you have accepted about the nature of G-d and man, good and evil, based on the teachings of the eternal, unchanging Torah? Is it based on teachings of Jewish leaders who never violated Deuteronomy 4:2 or 12:32 by cancelling or "reinventing" Torah? Does your community believe that certain Torah commandments can be disregarded by certain rabbis or mekubalim because of their lofty spirituality? Are your leaders teaching Torah, or are they (even unknowingly) offering a mixture of Torah and "universal ideas" from other religions? It's true that Torah contains universal ideas, but with clear boundaries and exclusions. Of special relevance here, we are explicitly commanded not to "inquire" how idol worshipers "serve their gods" so that we can "do likewise" for our own G-d. (Deut. 12:30) Is there anything in the body of today's accepted traditions passing as "Jewish" that can be found in ancient mystery religions, but not in Torah? Do you even know the Five Books well enough to answer that question?
(Isaiah 8:19-20, literal translation from Hebrew:) "And when they say to you, 'Seek the mediums [channelers] and wizards [adepts in occult mysteries] who chirp and mutter; shall not a people seek its god on behalf of the living among the dead?' To the Law and to the Testimony, if they will not speak according to this word: that it has no dawn [shahar]."
In other words, do not follow those leaders who refuse to confirm the fact that this is not the "dawning of a new age" and that Lucifer is not "son of the morning". Do not follow those who condone occult activities like communing with the dead. If you can't find such a rabbi to teach you, then stick to "the Law and the Testimony" on your own.
My rabbi, right or wrong. Have you been taught not to scrutinize what the sages taught for possible error? Have you been taught that your rabbis cannot be in error? (Infallibility was an old Catholic doctrine, if you please, and even they only applied it to the Pope!) If a leader you admire is following after something forbidden by Torah, do you feel obligated to follow him into it, or to stand on Deuteronomy 13? If false teachers of Torah were not possible, the Prophets would never have warned against them (see Ezekiel 34, Jeremiah 2:8, Zephaniah 3, Isaiah 28:7-14, etc). Speaking of the Prophets, do you really believe that their words are from G-d, that "all his words" given through the Prophets "are truth and righteousness", as the Haftarah blessing says? Have you ever taken time to study the Prophets, or are there entire passages of "truth and righteousness" which you've never even read once? Perhaps you been taught that the sages and rabbis have veto power over the Prophets - did you ever think to ask how that is possible if "not one" word of the Prophets "will turn back and return empty"? What will you do if you don't get an answer: stay or leave?

3. Restoring Those Around You
Educate the Jewish people to distance themselves from all groups which herald the New Age, and to disassociate themselves from all unJewish teachings.
Our main strength in this regard is: what are we lacking in our Tenach that we would need to supplement it with these foreign teachings? The Dalai Lama's challenge must be, and can be, answered. Why would Jews need a teaching about "karma" to pay for sins, when we can have Forgiveness with the promise, "I will remember your sins no more"? What Jew needs "reincarnation" when we've been promised Resurrection? Why accept the existence of evil in G-d when we have far better explanations in the books of Genesis, Job and Psalms? Which "channeler" has a track record anywhere near that of our own Prophets - and why are our people so ignorant of those amazing Jewish prophecies? (Israelis will know what I'm talking about; the old saying is still repeated by secular Israelis: "Anybody who lives in Israel and doesn't believe in miracles is just not being realistic....")
It is not enough, however, to say we don't need NA; we must disassociate ourselves from it in order to avoid the Divine judgment which NAers are destined to reap for their alliance with those eternal losers, the rebellious Hierarchy. Since the New Agers agree that Babylon, the chief guardian of the "ageless wisdom", has never ceased to exist spiritually, the following prophecy is quite as relevant for today as when it was given to the physical kingdom:
(Jeremiah 51:5-7, literal translation from Hebrew:) "For Israel has not been widowed, nor Judah, of his G-d the L-rd of Hosts, though their land is filled with guilt more than with the Holy One of Israel. Flee out of Babylon, and let every man save his life [or soul]; do not be cut off in her iniquity; for it is a time of vengeance to the L-rd, a wage He will pay to her. A cup of gold is Babylon in the hand of G-d, making all the earth drunk; nations have drunk her wine; therefore nations will go mad [yithollelu - interestingly, same root as Isaiah's helel, "the shining one" who fell from Heaven]. Suddenly has Babylon fallen and is broken..."
The rest of that chapter is very interesting as well. Israel is commanded, in addition to leaving physical Babylon, to specifically "flee from the Kasdim" (Chaldeans); these were the elite sorcerers of Babylon and possessors of the "secret doctrines". (see Isaiah 48:20; Jeremiah 50:8)
Arm your children with discernment. It is not possible to shield your children from the indoctrination now in progress. The New Age is counting on the young generation to usher in their Plan, and no effort has been spared to reach them. If you filter the TV and movies, they will get it through Disney productions and other innocent-looking programs. If you turn off access to the Internet, they will find it in many computer and video games. If you eliminate TV, computer and movies, they will be exposed in the classroom, on the school computer network, and in the libraries. If you home-school, they will learn it at the homes of their relatives or friends. Limiting their circles to "kosher" families, friends and organizations will not ensure their protection either, since Jewish communities have long been infiltrated [see the Missionizing Section]. Even relocating to Israel will not spare them from the onslaught [see the survey of NA religions operating in Israel, which only highlights the larger groups].
The only solution is to teach them how to spot the NA indoctrination, how to test it with Torah, and how to actively reject it for the fraud it is. Sit with them and point out examples (you'll have no shortage of material). Rent a video and pause it periodically to discuss with them why people find these concepts attractive, what is wrong with them from a Torah standpoint, and also where the Jews are being slandered in subtle ways. The role of villian in the more recent sci-fi productions often has Jewish mannerisms, or alternately fits the description of Bailey and others as a "vampire" who feeds on humanity; and occasionally the bad guy is openly identified as Jewish (for example, the recent movie version of _X Men_, where the archvillian is clearly a bitter Holocaust survivor). In my own attempts to educate children, I have found that kids as young as 7 can learn to identify NA messages with accuracy and explain why they are unacceptable.

4. Restoring the Jewish Community
Reconcile and Reunite. No one can ignore the friction in the community over different approaches to Jewish observance and lifestyle. It is not my intention to endorse one over another, although my own choices have been made with confidence. My point here is that this is no time to argue over what is surely a footnote to the threat facing the community. I stand by my contention that unless we rally around the Torah, our individual faith will not stand the test to come. But even if we do not resolve this issue, we have a better chance defending ourselves together than in separate corners. The snap judgments of the secular against the "Torah fanatics" and the orthodox against the "Torah breakers" must be replaced by a more thoughtful examination of the Other Side, with the realization that a media controlled by our common enemy will have an interest in feeding us misconceptions about each other to divide and conquer. If we have half a brain, we will invest more in dialog, to make sure the Other Side learns who we are without having to rely on the media. If we're really smart, we will make a joint commitment to protect all Jews from being delegitimized by NA propaganda, even when their lifestyle drives us up the wall. Accelerate the gathering of Diaspora Jews to Israel. It is obvious now more than ever that the Jews have no way of defending themselves outside the Land. When the Global Governance system becomes operational, it will be international policy to discriminate against Jews, to take away their children who have been "wrongly indoctrinated" and to target the whole lot of us for "cleansing action".
The only defensible position for Jews of any persuasion is to stand with their own people in their own land, where we have survived enemy attacks time and again (though rationally we can't explain why...). It is also the best defensive policy for Israel -- the more the better, since even with G-d's help, "Five will chase one hundred" but "a hundred will chase ten thousand." (Leviticus 26:8)
According to the published NA timetable, this leaves world Jewry about one to three years to consolidate in their land before they may be faced with the "Luciferic initiation" or the alternative. (G-d may decide to postpone their Plan again as He has apparently done several times, but who wants to gamble on this chance with their family?)

5. Restoring an Ancient Relationship
If the NA has its way, the Jews will be eliminated, along with any non-Jews who show loyalty to the Jewish Bible and people. The latter group is clearly a potential ally in resisting NA domination, but the largest contingent among these has ironically been the group under heaviest suspicion by Jews: the evangelical Christians. Even more ironically, this group more than any other has a faith system that most closely parallels that of religious Jews. With those Evangelicals who are not infected with "replacement theology" (which I suspect is a NA invention anyway), Torah Jews are highly compatible. These alone among the Christians are interested in moving backward theologically toward the earliest roots of Christianity, where their first leaders were actually Jews - and Jews who respected Torah, no less.
In a certain sense, this subgroup is the equivalent of younger brothers to the Jews, with a potential for a relationship that has not been as supportive in perhaps 1800 years. Yet most Jews continue to single out these particular Christians as objects of suspicion and mistrust, because of the strength of their convictions and their willingness to talk about what they believe to everyone. Including Jews. What's the matter with us? If a group systematically excluded Jews from receiving information about any other subject on earth, we would yell "antisemitism". Yet we react in anger and disgust when these Christians refuse to discriminate against Jews in offering what they consider valuable. The Jewish "Jesus allergy" belongs to another time and place, when the Jews were a homeless people, second-class, without right of refusal and at the mercy of a dominating Church (not evangelical, I should point out, but Catholic) which was intent on forcing Church teaching on us. We welcome "interfaith" activities with the kinds of Christians who won't bother us about their faith because they have none to share - they don't take our Bible seriously anymore (and therefore, don't be surprised if the day comes when they don't take Jews seriously either). Even with the group which once offended us most, the Catholics, all is forgiven since they no longer consider Jews worth recruiting. But we react with medieval hostility to one of the strongest allies the Jews will ever have, rejecting them precisely for the quality that makes them such firm friends: they are so convinced of their beliefs that they think others should consider them. Are we threatened by a group that believes our Prophets strongly enough to see a Jewish Messiah in them? What does that say about our attitude toward those Books which we ourselves gave them? What does it say about our confidence in our own identity? Some will reply that we avoid anything to do with the Christians in general because of their habit of denigrating the Jewish people for rejecting Jesus. Okay. Why aren't we avoiding and ostracizing the New Agers from our communities for the same reason? Our one-track idea of "soul stealers" has blinded us to the point where far more souls are being stolen by pagan mystics than by any church we know.
The New Age has an interest in keeping Jews and Evangelicals at odds with each other. An alliance for mutual strengthening on social and spiritual levels would present a formidable front to the NA onslaught on both our communities. They would happily encourage us to continue viewing Evangelicals as "deceptive" for explaining their faith in terms of our traditions, while they plant suspicions among the Christians that orthodox Jews are "deceptive" for secretly slandering Gentiles in our Talmud. An organization like "Toward Tradition" must infuriate NAers because it is successfully bringing observant Jews and evangelical Christians together to work in a broad area of common values, without allergic reactions to the faith of the other side. Curiously, it bothers many Jews for the same reason: the historical friction and mutual suspicion have been set aside for more urgent issues, and that alone constitutes grounds for suspicion. (See "Onward Christians' Rabbi", _The Jerusalem Report_, Apr.24, 2000)
If this Jewish-Christian cooperation spreads, there's no telling what damage it may do to The Plan.

6. Restoring Disillusioned New Agers
Here I have in mind Jews primarily, but any human being who is willing to listen is worthy of our efforts. After all, our G-d has promised to take a people for Himself from among the nations (see Isaiah 51:4 and Amos 9:12, among others). What better "world service" could we perform than to offer the one thing that NA is trying to withhold from these seekers? Just think: our unique G-d is now the "forbidden fruit" in the Garden of Aquarius! And there will certainly be hungry inhabitants in that Garden who have discovered that the standard fare leaves one rather hollow inside. Mount an aggressive campaign of information. Judging from my own personal dialog with many in the various NA networks, even those in direct contact with spirit guides have doubts at times about the validity of their path. Some have expressed disillusionment over the savage power struggles, back-stabbing and ego trips running rampant among supposedly "enlightened" people, even at the highest levels. It appears that the world peace, unity and goodwill (at least at this stage) are falling short of all the rosy predictions. I believe that this will always be the case unless true repentance (in Biblical terms) takes place. But I also believe that, as the NAers themselves predict, there will eventually be a leader strong enough to force a semblance of unity on all parties, using psychic or spiritual power (probably gained by the "Luciferic initiation") to whip them into line.
Until that time, we must take advantage of the disarray in the NA ranks. Besides the weak points noted above, here are others that can be used:

6a. "The Masters" and their slaves: Many "initiates" are disappointed in their failure to find the inner peace they were promised. Instead they are struggling with psychic powers going out of control, unpleasant "visitations" from spirits, and nameless overwhelming fears, all of which increase the "higher" they "ascend". It is almost taboo for them to admit to these frightening problems, but such people will be open to possible explanations. To them I propose the following thought: As mentioned before, some information has been (and likely is now being) withheld from the public by NA leaders, on the pretext that people are not yet "evolved" enough to accept it. Such items of information revealed lately, however, have turned out to be not deep concepts, but unpalatable programs which a few short years ago were considered immoral - thus the real obstacle was that they could not be revealed until the public resistance was weaker. In this context, even the highest level New Agers, those at the level of Robert Muller, ought to be asking themselves how they can be sure the "ascended masters" have been straight with even their highest human disciples. I would submit that just as NA leaders have hidden certain "controversial" elements of the Plan from the public, there can just as easily be parts of the Plan kept from all humanity by these "benevolent" spirit guides, proposals which would meet with human resistance, even from Robert Muller, if fully known. The increasing lack of personal serenity and equilibrium as one moves toward the future "initiation" ought to raise questions, for that was not part of the deal.... For such seasoned political double-talkers and cynical "reshapers of society" as those in the NA to never imagine they might be beaten at their own game by a higher intelligence shows astonishing naivete.

6b. Why are They afraid of the Jewish Force? One reality of life which stubbornly refuses to be explained away by the most clever NA arguments is: our presence. The Jews, supposedly an inferior race, have not only somehow survived the centuries which wiped out all other contemporary civilizations (including super-charged Atlantis and the Third Reich), but survived intensive attempts by enemies to "help" it into oblivion.
We as a people are a monkey wrench in the NA theory of human evolution, mainly because our G-d is a thorn in the eye of the "ascended masters". Get rid of the Jews and their Book, and their G-d will disappear too - or at least be proven faithless. But they seem powerless to do it, and as a result they openly hate our G-d. (I'm speaking of the "higher intelligences" now, since they are the self-proclaimed authors of the cosmic War to the death.) A declaration of war implies the recognition of a threatening power to be opposed - a dead giveaway that the "ascended masters" know our G-d exists; not only that, but His strength is dreaded (all their recorded ridicule notwithstanding).
One might be annoyed by a fiction, but one would certainly not feel threatened - especially entities at the level of enlightenment and self-control which the "Hierarchy" claims. Those who respond that the "Masters" have declared war only on "the outmoded idea" of the Jewish G-d must explain why the "Masters" themselves confess that the physical Jewish people have always been and continue to be their target, down to the last person. "Ideas" are eliminated through education. People are eliminated through physical death.
More than anything, New Agers respect displays of power and supernatural events. It should be pointed out to them that even if they consider this G-d of the Jews only an "idea", it must be one powerful "Idea" to preserve a distinct people against impossible odds and a long line of enemies over 4000 years. It clearly beat anything the Atlanteans had, since their civilization collapsed in competition with it. The New Age shouldn't be so quick to reject an Idea with that kind of "vibration level" - perhaps they should read the Bible for themselves before rejecting it....

7. Answering the Challenge - Spirit to Spirit
We need to remember that the New Agers are the human puppets of an unseen adversary in this war. The real battle is actually raging over all our heads; their gods vs. our G-d.
But calling it a "spiritual" war does not keep the battle in the ethereal and abstract realms. As we have seen, the Hierarchy's Cosmic War must be anchored on earth, among flesh and blood people, in order to carry on. In Biblical accounts of wars involving Israel, the line between the spiritual and the physical was usually a dotted line - crossovers between the seen and the unseen worlds were taken as a matter of course. Modern Israelis are aware of the same porous state between material and spiritual, again most noticeable during the many wars (declared and otherwise) this nation has sustained in its 53 short years.
Spiritual wars call for spiritual weapons. According to the Torah, G-d Himself is both shield and sword for Israel (Deuteronomy 33:29). In the Prophets, we see the valiant warrior Gideon launching his attack on the Midianites with a dual arsenal: "a sword for the L-rd and for Gideon!" (Judges 7:20) The servants of G-d are given words which function as effectively as a "sharp sword". (Isaiah 49:2) Specifically, the very words of the Prophets are weapons which can cut an adversary of G-d to bits (Hosea 6:5). For this reason alone, every Jew who takes a stand against the NA threat ought to become adept at finding the right words in the Prophets for each situation. Build your expertise in handling these powerful spiritual weapons. How does such a weapon work? Simpler than you think. Do as the prophets themselves did: speak the appropriate words of G-d to whoever needs to hear them, human or spirit. (Be prepared for possible confrontations with hostile spirit guides.) G-d will see to the rest, including guidance on what physical steps should be taken. (Naturally, one can't really do this if one lacks the faith to deal with unseen realities. The first step may be to study the examples of those who did have such faith, namely the prophets, judges and righteous kings of Israel.)
Two of my favorite personal weapons:
The first is addressed to the NA Hierarchy and their servants - Isaiah 8:9-14 (with various possible translations from the literal Hebrew). Its relevance will intrigue readers who have stayed with me through the entire series:
Rage, you peoples, and be shattered; and give ear, all remote places of the earth. Gird yourselves, and you will be shattered; gird yourselves, and you will be shattered. Take counsel with advice [or, as in some translations, devise a Plan], but it will come to nothing; speak the word, but it will not stand, for G-d is with us. For thus the L-rd spoke to me with a strong hand and disciplined me from walking in the way of this people, saying: "You are not to say, A conspiracy! to all that this people say is a conspiracy [literally, Connection! to all which this people say is interconnected], and you shall not fear their fear or be afraid of it [esteem it/him]. It is the L-rd of Hosts whom you should regard as holy. And He shall be your fear, and He shall be your dread [or, high esteem]. Then He will become a sanctuary...."
The second one - Isaiah 60:1-2 - is dedicated to the Jewish people, who are not going to be left in the dark when the Age of Aquarius descends on this planet: Arise, shine; for your Light has come, the glory of the L-rd has risen upon you. Behold, darkness will cover [the] earth, and deep darkness [the] nations. And on you the L-rd will rise, and on you His glory will be seen.